Bangladesh

Results are from an analysis of the 2016 Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES). Information on methodology is in the report and in the method briefs.

Prevalence Of Functional Difficulties

In Bangladesh, the share of adults aged 15 and older with any functional difficulty stands at 8%. Separating by level of difficulty, the prevalence rates of some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are 6.3% and 1.6% respectively. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher for women (8.9%) than for men (7%). Functional difficulties are more prevalent among older age groups, at 2.3% for ages 15 to 29, 4.5% for ages 30 to 44, 14% for ages 45 to 64, and 33.9% for ages 65 and over. Across the six functional domains considered, difficulties with seeing (5.2%) and hearing (2.6%) are most common.

At the household level, the prevalence of any functional difficulty is at 17.9%, including 13.8% with some difficulty and 4.1% with at least a lot of difficulty. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas: 8.4% vs. 6.7% among adults and 19% vs. 15.2% among households, for rural and urban areas, respectively.

Table 1: Bangladesh: Prevalence Of Functional Difficulties (%)

Group Any difficulty Some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty
All adults 7.96 6.34 1.61
Females 8.88 7.33 1.55
Males 7.00 5.31 1.69
Rural residents 8.44 6.71 1.72
Urban residents 6.74 5.40 1.33
Ages 15 to 29 2.29 1.68 0.61
Ages 30 to 44 4.50 3.71 0.79
Ages 45 to 64 13.98 11.81 2.17
Ages 65 and over 33.91 25.19 8.72
Seeing 5.19 4.55 0.64
Hearing 2.56 2.18 0.39
Mobility 2.47 1.85 0.62
Cognitive 1.70 1.27 0.42
Self-care 1.48 1.02 0.45
Communication 1.35 0.91 0.44
All households 17.94 13.80 4.14
Rural households 19.00 14.59 4.41
Urban households 15.23 11.79 3.44

Source: Bangladesh 2016 HIES, own calculations

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by persons with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 2. Table 2 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of persons deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, work, health, and standard of living. Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 84% compared to 77% for persons with some functional difficulty and 61% for persons with no difficulty.

Table 2: Bangladesh: Key Indicators For Adults Age 15+ By Functional Difficulty Status (% And Percentage Points)

Indicator No Difficulty Some Difficulty Difference between no difficulty and some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty Difference between no difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 61 77 -16*** 84 -22***
Less than primary school 32 58 -25*** 64 -32***
Employment population ratio 44 30 15*** 19 25***
Safely managed drinking water 97 98 0* 97 1
Safely managed sanitation 20 21 0 21 -1
Clean fuel 97 97 0 98 -1
Electricity 78 72 5*** 75 3**
Adequate housing 80 78 2*** 78 2
Owns assets 19 17 1*** 17 2***
Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. ‘-‘ indicates not available. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages.
Source: Bangladesh 2016 HIES, own calculations

Education

The share of adults who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is significantly higher among persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty (64%) and persons with some difficulty (58%) compared to persons with no difficulty (32%). This boils down to gaps of 25 percentage points (p.p.) between persons with some functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty and 32 p.p. between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty.

Work

Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a lower employment population ratio (or share of the population working) than persons with no difficulty, at 19% and 44%, respectively. At 30%, persons with some difficulty also have a lower employment population ratio than persons with no difficulty.

Health

Rates of access to safely managed drinking water and sanitation are overall similar for the different functional difficulty groups.

Standard of Living

Rates of access to clean fuel are similar across the different functional difficulty groups. Rates of access to electricity, adequate housing, and asset ownership are lower among persons with some or at least a lot of difficulty compared to persons with no difficulty, but in the case of adequate housing, the difference is statistically significant only between persons with some difficulty and persons with no difficulty.

More results for Bangladesh are available in results tables on the ddi website.