Indonesia

Results are from an analysis of the 2010 Population and Housing Census. Information on methodology is in the report and in the method briefs.

Prevalence of Functional Difficulties

In Indonesia, the share of adults aged 15 and older with any functional difficulty stands at 5.3%. Separating by level of difficulty, the prevalence rates of some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are 4.4% and 0.9% respectively. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher for women (5.8%) than for men (4.8%). Functional difficulties are more prevalent among older age groups, at 1% for ages 15 to 29, 2% for ages 30 to 44, 8.4% for ages 45 to 64, and 31.1% for ages 65 and over. Across the five functional domains considered, difficulties with seeing (3.5%) and mobility (1.8%) are most common.
About one in ten households have an adult with any functional difficulty: at the household level, the prevalence of any functional difficulty is at 11.7%, including 9.3% with some difficulty and 2.4% with at least a lot of difficulty. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas: 5.8% vs. 4.7% among adults and 12.8% vs. 10.5% among households, for rural and urban areas, respectively.

Table 1: Indonesia: Prevalence of functional difficulties (%)

Group Any difficulty Some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty
All adults 5.26 4.35 0.91
Females 5.75 4.76 0.99
Males 4.76 3.94 0.83
Rural residents 5.84 4.75 1.08
Urban residents 4.69 3.95 0.73
Ages 15 to 29 1.02 0.71 0.31
Ages 30 to 44 2.01 1.62 0.39
Ages 45 to 64 8.39 7.46 0.93
Ages 65 and over 31.14 24.92 6.22
Seeing 3.45 3.15 0.30
Hearing 1.79 1.52 0.26
Mobility 1.82 1.44 0.38
Cognitive 1.58 1.24 0.34
Self-care 1.14 0.84 0.30
Communication
All households 11.67 9.31 2.35
Rural households 12.78 10.03 2.75
Urban households 10.51 8.57 1.94
Notes: ‘-’ indicates not available.
Source: Indonesia 2010 Population and Housing Census, own calculations

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by persons with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 2. Table 2 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of persons deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, work, health, and standard of living. Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 68% compared to 45% for persons with some functional difficulty and 22% for persons with no difficulty.

Table 2: Indonesia: Key indicators for adults age 15+ by functional difficulty status (% and percentage points)

Indicator No Difficulty Some Difficulty Difference between no difficulty and some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty Difference between no difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 22 45 -23*** 68 -46***
Less than primary school 13 43 -30*** 61 -48***
Employment population ratio 63 49 15*** 19 44***
Safely managed drinking water 87 85 2*** 83 4***
Safely managed sanitation 69 67 1*** 63 5***
Clean fuel 48 39 9*** 33 15***
Electricity 94 93 1*** 92 3***
Adequate housing 77 72 5*** 68 9***
Owns assets
Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. ‘-’ indicates not available. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages.
Source: Indonesia 2010 Population and Housing Census, own calculations

Education

The share of adults who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is significantly higher among persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty (61%) and persons with some difficulty (43%) compared to persons with no difficulty (13%). This boils down to gaps of 30 percentage points (p.p.) between persons with some functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty and 48 p.p. between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty.

Work

Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a lower employment population ratio (or share of the population working) than persons with no difficulty, at 19% and 63%, respectively. At 49%, persons with some difficulty also have a significantly lower employment population ratio than persons with no difficulty.

Health

Rates of access to safely managed drinking water and sanitation are lower for persons with some functional difficulty and even lower for persons with at least a lot of difficulty compared to persons with no difficulty.

Standard of Living

There are significant differences in terms of the share of individuals with clean fuel, electricity, and asset ownership, with lower rates for persons with some difficulty and even lower rates for persons with at least a lot of difficulty.

More results for Indonesia are available in results tables on the ddi website.