Rwanda

Results are from an analysis of the 2018 Labor Force Survey (LFS). Information on methodology is in the report and in the method briefs.

Prevalence of Functional Difficulties

In Rwanda, the share of adults aged 15 and older with any functional difficulty stands at 8.9%. Separating by level of difficulty, the prevalence rates of some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are 5.2% and 3.7% respectively. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher for women (9.6%) than for men (8.1%). Functional difficulties are more prevalent among older age groups, at 3.5% for ages 15 to 29, 5.3% for ages 30 to 44, 16.6% for ages 45 to 64, and 40.3% for ages 65 and over. Across the six functional domains considered, difficulties with seeing (3.9%) and mobility (3.7%) are most common.

About two in ten households have an adult with any functional difficulty: at the household level, the prevalence of any functional difficulty is at 20.3%, including 11.1% with some difficulty and 9.1% with at least a lot of difficulty. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas: 10.1% vs. 4.5% among adults and 22.6% vs. 11.5% among households, for rural and urban areas, respectively.

Table 1: Rwanda: Prevalence of functional difficulties (%)

Group Any difficulty Some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty
All adults 8.88 5.21 3.66
Females 9.59 5.64 3.95
Males 8.07 4.73 3.34
Rural residents 10.12 6.01 4.10
Urban residents 4.54 2.41 2.13
Ages 15 to 29 3.50 1.92 1.58
Ages 30 to 44 5.29 3.44 1.85
Ages 45 to 64 16.57 11.01 5.56
Ages 65 and over 40.31 19.49 20.82
Seeing 3.90 2.69 1.21
Hearing 1.83 1.12 0.71
Mobility 3.69 2.02 1.68
Cognitive 2.37 1.62 0.75
Self-care 0.76 0.33 0.43
Communication 0.47 0.24 0.23
All households 20.26 11.14 9.12
Rural households 22.62 12.66 9.96
Urban households 11.51 5.52 5.99

Source: Rwanda 2018 LFS, own calculations

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by persons with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 2. Table 2 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of persons deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, work, health, and standard of living. Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 94% compared to 87% for persons with some functional difficulty and 72% for persons with no difficulty.

Table 2: Rwanda: Key indicators for adults age 15+ by functional difficulty status (% and percentage points)

Indicator No Difficulty Some Difficulty Difference between no difficulty and some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty Difference between no difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 72 87 -15*** 94 -22***
Less than primary school 47 71 -24*** 79 -32***
Employment population ratio 57 46 11*** 27 30***
Safely managed drinking water 88 81 7*** 80 8***
Safely managed sanitation 78 86 -8*** 85 -7***
Clean fuel 7 1 5*** 1 5***
Electricity 99 98 1* 98 1**
Adequate housing 1 0 0 0 0
Owns assets 23 15 8*** 14 9***
Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages.
Source: Rwanda 2018 LFS, own calculations

Education

The share of adults who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is significantly higher among persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty (79%) and persons with some difficulty (71%) compared to persons with no difficulty (47%). This boils down to gaps of 24 percentage points (p.p.) between persons with some functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty and 32 p.p. between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty.

Work

Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a lower employment population ratio (or share of the population working) than persons with no difficulty, at 27% and 57%, respectively. At 46%, persons with some difficulty also have a significantly lower employment population ratio than persons with no difficulty.

Health 

There are significant differences in terms of the rates of access to safely managed drinking water and sanitation, with lower rates for persons with some difficulty and even lower rates for persons with at least a lot of difficulty.

Standard of Living

Rates of adequate housing are similar across functional difficulty status. Rates of access to clean fuel, electricity, and asset ownership are lower among persons with some or at least a lot of difficulty compared to persons with no difficulty.

More results for Rwanda are available in results tables on the ddi website.