Vietnam

Results are from an analysis of the 2009 Population and Housing Census. Information on methodology is in the report and in the method briefs.

Prevalence of Functional Difficulties

In Vietnam, the share of adults aged 15 and older with any functional difficulty stands at 9.1%. Separating by level of difficulty, the prevalence rates of some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are 7.2% and 2% respectively. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher for women (9.9%) than for men (8.3%). Functional difficulties are more prevalent among older age groups, at 1.8% for ages 15 to 29, 3.2% for ages 30 to 44, 13.2% for ages 45 to 64, and 49.9% for ages 65 and over. Across the four functional domains considered, difficulties with seeing (6%) and mobility (4.4%) are most common.

About two in ten households have an adult with any functional difficulty: at the household level, the prevalence of any functional difficulty is at 19.9%, including 14.8% with some difficulty and 5.1% with at least a lot of difficulty. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas: 10% vs. 7.2% among adults and 21.6% vs. 16% among households, for rural and urban areas, respectively.

Table 1: Vietnam: Prevalence of functional difficulties (%)

Group Any difficulty Some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty
All adults 9.14 7.18 1.96
Females 9.90 7.84 2.06
Males 8.34 6.49 1.85
Rural residents 9.98 7.81 2.17
Urban residents 7.23 5.76 1.47
Ages 15 to 29 1.81 1.19 0.62
Ages 30 to 44 3.22 2.43 0.79
Ages 45 to 64 13.21 11.35 1.86
Ages 65 and over 49.86 37.97 11.90
Seeing 6.00 5.26 0.74
Hearing 3.72 2.99 0.73
Mobility 4.41 3.35 1.06
Cognitive 4.14 3.21 0.93
Self-care
Communication
All households 19.89 14.82 5.07
Rural households 21.62 16.03 5.59
Urban households 15.97 12.08 3.88
Notes: ‘-’ indicates not available.
Source: Vietnam 2009 Population and Housing Census, own calculations

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by persons with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 2. Table 2 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of persons deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, work, health, and standard of living. Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 72% compared to 49% for persons with some functional difficulty and 17% for persons with no difficulty.

Table 2: Vietnam: Key indicators for adults age 15+ by functional difficulty status (% and percentage points)

Indicator No Difficulty Some Difficulty Difference between no difficulty and some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty Difference between no difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 17 49 -32*** 72 -54***
Less than primary school 25 60 -35*** 75 -50***
Employment population ratio 78 46 31*** 18 59***
Safely managed drinking water 90 89 1*** 89 1***
Safely managed sanitation 93 92 1*** 91 2***
Clean fuel 44 31 12*** 28 15***
Electricity 97 97 0*** 97 0***
Adequate housing 84 84 0** 85 -1***
Owns assets 43 39 3*** 35 7***
Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages.
Source: Vietnam 2009 Population and Housing Census, own calculations

Education

The share of adults who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is significantly higher among persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty (75%) and persons with some difficulty (60%) compared to persons with no difficulty (25%). This boils down to gaps of 35 percentage points (p.p.) between persons with some functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty and 50 p.p. between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty.

Work

Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a lower employment population ratio (or share of the population working) than persons with no difficulty, at 18% and 78%, respectively. At 46%, persons with some difficulty also have a lower employment population ratio than persons with no difficulty.

Health

There are small (2 p.p. or lower) but statistically significant differences in terms of the rates of access to safely managed drinking water and sanitation, with lower rates for persons with some and at least a lot of difficulty compared to persons with no difficulty.

Standard of Living

Rates of access to adequate housing are significantly lower among persons with some difficulty (less than 1 p.p.) but higher among persons with at least a lot of difficulty (1 p.p.) compared to persons with no difficulty. There are significant differences in terms of the share of individuals with clean fuel and those who own assets, with lower rates for persons with some or at least a lot of difficulty compared to persons with no difficulty. For clean fuel, these differences are large (more than 10 p.p), where they are 12 and 15 p.p., respectively.

More results for Vietnam are available in results tables on the ddi website.