Djibouti

Results are from an analysis of the 2017 Enquete Djiboutienne aupres des Menages (EDAM). Information on methodology is in the report and in the method briefs.

Prevalence of Functional Difficulties

In Djibouti, the share of adults aged 15 and older with any functional difficulty stands at 11.2%. Separating by level of difficulty, the prevalence rates of some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are 6.4% and 4.8% respectively. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher for women (11.6%) than for men (10.7%). Functional difficulties are more prevalent among older age groups, at 4.5% for ages 15 to 29, 8.5% for ages 30 to 44, 22.6% for ages 45 to 64, and 44.7% for ages 65 and over. Across the five functional domains considered, difficulties with seeing (8.7%) and mobility (6.1%) are most common.

About three in ten households have an adult with any functional difficulty: at the household level, the prevalence of any functional difficulty is at 28.6%, including 17.3% with some difficulty and 11.3% with at least a lot of difficulty. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas: 16.1% vs. 10.6% among adults and 28.7% vs. 28.6% among households, for rural and urban areas, respectively.

Table 1: Djibouti: Prevalence of functional difficulties (%)

Group Any difficulty Some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty
All adults 11.16 6.41 4.75
Females 11.63 7.11 4.52
Males 10.68 5.69 4.99
Rural residents 16.06 5.37 10.69
Urban residents 10.61 6.52 4.09
Ages 15 to 29 4.52 1.37 3.15
Ages 30 to 44 8.54 4.66 3.88
Ages 45 to 64 22.56 16.12 6.44
Ages 65 and over 44.74 26.87 17.87
Seeing 8.73 5.29 3.45
Hearing 4.65 1.84 2.81
Mobility 6.11 2.89 3.22
Cognitive 4.08 1.21 2.87
Self-care
Communication 3.11 0.65 2.46
All households 28.60 17.30 11.29
Rural households 28.70 12.35 16.35
Urban households 28.57 18.45 10.12
Notes: ‘-’ indicates not available.
Source: Djibouti 2017 EDAM, own calculations

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by persons with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 2. Table 2 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of persons deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, work, health, and standard of living. Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 84% compared to 83% for persons with some functional difficulty and 81% for persons with no difficulty.

Table 2: Djibouti: Key Indicators For Adults Age 15+ By Functional Difficulty Status (% And Percentage Points)

Indicator No Difficulty Some Difficulty Difference between no difficulty and some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty Difference between no difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 81 83 -2 84 -3
Less than primary school 47 68 -21*** 67 -20***
Employment population ratio 22 25 -3 14 8***
Safely managed drinking water 92 94 -1* 81 11***
Safely managed sanitation 76 81 -5*** 71 4**
Clean fuel 21 18 3 28 -7***
Electricity 72 77 -6*** 58 14***
Adequate housing 64 73 -9*** 56 8***
Owns assets 34 36 -2*** 27 6***
Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages.
Source: Djibouti 2017 EDAM, own calculations

Education

The share of adults who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is significantly higher among persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty (67%) and persons with some difficulty (68%) compared to persons with no difficulty (47%). This boils down to gaps of 21 percentage points (p.p.) between persons with some functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty and 20 p.p. between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty.

Work

Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a lower employment population ratio (or share of the population working) than persons with no difficulty, at 14% and 22%, respectively. At 25%, persons with some difficulty have a higher employment population ratio than persons with no difficulty, but this difference is not statistically significant.

Health

There are significant differences in terms of the rates of access to safely managed drinking water and sanitation, with higher rates for persons with some difficulty but lower rates for persons with at least a lot of difficulty compared to persons with no difficulty.

Standard of Living

There is a statistically significant difference in the rates of access to clean fuel only between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty, at 28% and 21%, respectively. There are also significant differences in terms of the share of individuals with electricity, adequate housing, and asset ownership, with higher rates for persons with some difficulty but lower rates for persons with at least a lot of difficulty.

More results for Djibouti are available in results tables on the ddi website.