Cambodia

Results are from an analysis of the 2014 Demographic and Health Survey. Information on methodology is in the report and in the method briefs.

Prevalence Of Functional Difficulties

In Cambodia, the share of adults aged 15 and older with any functional difficulty stands at 12%. Separating by level of difficulty, the prevalence rates of some difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty are 9.4% and 2.6% respectively. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher for women (13.2%) than for men (10.8%). Functional difficulties are more prevalent among older age groups, at 3% for ages 15 to 29, 6.9% for ages 30 to 44, 19.3% for ages 45 to 64, and 51.3% for ages 65 and over. Across the six functional domains considered, difficulties with seeing (6.7%) and cognition (5.3%) are most common.

At the household level, the prevalence of any functional difficulty is at 27.8%, including 20.3% with some difficulty and 7.3% with at least a lot of difficulty. The prevalence of functional difficulties is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas: 12.4% vs. 10.5% among adults and 27.7% vs. 28.8% among households, for rural and urban areas, respectively.

Table 1: Cambodia: Prevalence Of Functional Difficulties (%)

Group Any difficulty Some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty
All adults 12.03 9.39 2.64
Females 13.18 10.36 2.82
Males 10.75 8.31 2.43
Rural residents 12.35 9.71 2.64
Urban residents 10.47 7.86 2.61
Ages 15 to 29 3.00 2.13 0.88
Ages 30 to 44 6.89 5.81 1.08
Ages 45 to 64 19.32 16.28 3.04
Ages 65 and over 51.32 35.97 15.35
Seeing 6.67 5.81 0.85
Hearing 3.59 2.88 0.71
Mobility 4.77 3.67 1.09
Cognitive 5.33 4.49 0.84
Self-care 1.27 0.73 0.54
Communication 1.81 1.09 0.72
All households 27.84 20.35 7.49
Rural households 27.68 20.34 7.33
Urban households 28.77 20.37 8.40

Source: Cambodia 2014 Demographic and Health Survey, own calculations

Key indicators on the deprivations and wellbeing experienced by persons with and without functional difficulties are presented in Table 2. Table 2 begins with information on the multidimensional poverty headcount—the rate of persons deprived in more than one dimension in the areas of education, work, health, and standard of living. Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a multidimensional poverty headcount of 90% compared to 84% for persons with some functional difficulty and 71% for persons with no difficulty.

Table 2: Cambodia: Key Indicators For Adults Age 15+ By Functional Difficulty Status (% And Percentage Points)

Indicator No Difficulty Some Difficulty Difference between no difficulty and some difficulty At least a lot of difficulty Difference between no difficulty and at least a lot of difficulty
Multidimensional poverty headcount 71 84 -13*** 90 -19***
Less than primary school 51 74 -23*** 81 -30***
Employment population ratio 79 77 2 57 22***
Safely managed drinking water 66 66 0 65 1
Safely managed sanitation 51 49 2* 48 3
Clean fuel 18 13 5*** 12 6***
Electricity 60 58 1 57 2
Adequate housing 25 22 2** 19 6***
Owns assets 48 45 3*** 43 4***
Notes: *, **, and *** indicate that the difference is statistically significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels respectively. Numbers in the difference columns are in percentage points while all other numbers in the table are percentages.
Source: Cambodia 2014 Demographic and Health Survey, own calculations

Education

The share of adults who have less than primary school as their highest level of schooling attained is significantly higher among persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty (81%) and persons with some difficulty (74%) compared to persons with no difficulty (51%). This boils down to gaps of 23 percentage points (p.p.) between persons with some functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty and 30 p.p. between persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty.

Work

Persons with at least a lot of functional difficulty have a lower employment population ratio (or share of the population working) than persons with no difficulty, at 57% and 79%, respectively. At 77%, persons with some difficulty also have a lower employment population ratio than persons with no difficulty, but this difference is not statistically significant.

Health

Rates of access to safely managed drinking water and sanitation are overall similar for the different functional difficulty groups. However, there is a statistically significant difference in the rates of access to safely managed sanitation between persons with some functional difficulty and persons with no difficulty, at 49% and 51%, respectively.

Standard of Living

Rates of access to electricity are similar across the different functional difficulty groups. There are significant differences in terms of the share of individuals with clean fuel, adequate housing, and asset ownership, with lower rates for persons with some difficulty and even lower rates for persons with at least a lot of difficulty.

More results for Cambodia are available in results tables on the ddi website.